The Village Voice reports that:

“Virtually all the people who create white nationalist ideology are funded by them,” says Heidi Beirich, a writer at the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate groups around the country. The list of Pioneer Fund grantees includes a who’s who of “race science” figures… Michelle Ilse Weyher was the Germany-born third wife of the Pioneer Fund’s former president, Harry Weyher… After 44 years as the fund’s president, Harry Weyher died in 2002… Weyher played a role in the Pioneer Fund’s selection process. She helped to decide which applicants received the few grants the fund gave out each year… Jim Murray, Weyher’s boyfriend and a Long Island native, says she died quietly of a cancer that few knew she had. Murray, who used to own a limo company in New York, spent the last few years with Weyher at her North Carolina home… Weyher bequeathed everything to Murray...

When asked what he thought about the Pioneer Fund’s mission, he simply burst out laughing.

Anyone have a list of the names, addresses and personal background information on the major supporters of the SPLC, ADL, etc.?

They don’t make big budget films about the far right in Britain.  In fact, it’s rare for any film to be made about it.  But one was made last year based on the personal experiences of its director, Shane Meadows.  These are my impressions of it.

IT’S 1983, the first day of the school summer holidays.  We open with a couple of minutes of genuine archive footage.  Mrs Thatcher appears, tearful crowds see the Falklands fleet out of harbour, then follow shots from some inane TV show – not really a contrast, as all these scenes are part of the same “spectacle”.  Next come some disturbing shots of dead and wounded soldiers being hurriedly ferried away from a Falklands battlefield, and it’s these last that implicitly form a backdrop for the film itself.

Shaun, played by Thomas Turgoose, is a severely undersized 13-year-old North-country boy (the scene-setting is reminiscent of that in Ken Loach’s Kes).  He has lost his father in the Falklands War.  His mum (Jo Hartley) just doesn’t possess the inner resources to help him get over it, and he’s scoffed at and bullied at school.

One day he’s befriended by a gang of older kids - rather patronisingly, perhaps they want him as a mascot.  They are punk/skinhead types, not political, indeed on the verge of criminality.  Membership of the gang (which has one black member, a friendly and gentle boy called “Milky”) takes Shaun out of himself.  The boys play fantasy/hunting games in derelict buildings: - a waste of time perhaps, but now Shaun feels that he’s needed and has a purpose.

But then an older member named Combo (Stephen Graham), whom we haven’t met before, rejoins the gang.  He’s been in prison, manfully taking the rap, it seems, for one of the other members.  He quickly re-establishes himself as the feared leader, and preaches a programme of white supremacy.  A pivotal moment in the film has been reached, and the mood of the action changes.

READ MORE...

Even self-professed National Socialists who reject liberalism in theory show the same expressive individualism of their peers in practice.  Their rallies are just as anarchic as those of their opposition.  Both sides in Knoxville were composed of dishevelled individualists venting their random emotions.  The classic Nazi rallies of the 1930s projected discipline, order, submission of the individual to the collective will.  Their contemporary imitators are usually nothing more than fetishists enamored with the Nazi aesthetic, as if it were another one their grotesque tattoos (indeed, this is often the case).  They may put on the clothes and flash around the symbols of the Third Reich, but the soul of National Socialism is not there.

This paragraph from a comment on the Interesting life thread by Scimitar of Occidental Dissent opens up a vein of discursive possibilities.  What is individualism, as it pertains to the life of European Man?  From whence does it spring?  Where, for us, does it lead?

There appears to be quite a bit of confusion surrounding the term.  Let’s dispel a deal of that straight away by saying what, in the sense of any understanding useful to us, it is not. 

Individualism is not a free-wheeling, self-expressive personality thing.  It is not a gun-toting independence of spirit.  It is not studied eccentricity or glamourousness, nor any attribute of self-hood.  Let us be clear that individualism, as the enduring political value of our age, is not to be apprehended at the level of the sad little, unawares “individual” at all.  It abides, somewhat counter-intuitively and as an abstraction, in the sum of the atomised parts ... to be precise, in the liberal social dynamic which atomises us and which preconditions the life we can lead.

For individualism is the inherent value in liberal philosophy and politics.  The social dynamic, that insatiable, promiscuous, ideological search for freedom, is our jealous adoptive parent.  It never quite succeeds in making us forget the old collective fetters of nation, faith and tradition, through each of which the European sociobiology unfolds.

READ MORE...

Inside Higher Ed reports that:

On Thursday, Robert L. Trivers took a train to Boston to give a talk at Harvard University the next day. Trivers is a prominent evolutionary biologist and anthropologist at Rutgers University and he had been invited to Cambridge in honor of his having won this year’s Crafoord Prize in Biosciences, a top international award that many consider a notch below the Nobel.

Trivers never got to give his talk. He says that hours before he was scheduled to lecture, he was called by an organizer and told that the appearance was being called off because of statements he had made about and to Alan Dershowitz, a law professor at Harvard. In a letter to the editor of The Wall Street Journal last week, Trivers quoted from an April letter he had sent Dershowitz. In that letter, Trivers wrote: “Regarding your rationalization of Israeli attacks on Lebanese civilians, let me just say that if there is a repeat of Israeli butchery toward Lebanon and if you decide once again to rationalize it publicly, look forward to a visit from me. Nazis — and Nazi-like apologists such as yourself — need to be confronted directly.”

According to Trivers, Dershowitz used his letter to have him declared “a threat” and blocked from speaking at Harvard…

So, why is Trivers caught up in this debate? His two sisters married Lebanese men, so Trivers has family in Beirut and has learned much about the country. His current research is about national myths and self-deception, and one of the examples he is exploring concerns Israel’s invasion of Lebanon last year.

Trivers, one of the two main biological weapons launched against W. D. Hamilton (the other being Axelrod) is now being turned against his own people, subsequent to his sisters marrying Lebanese.  My my… it’s enough to make you think about extended phenotypes or something.

OK, I admit, as a supporter of self-determination,  I am an Oslo Accords Zionist…. but I don’t think either Dershowitz or Trivers can justify claiming to support the Oslo Accords.

PS: It should be noted that Dershowitz hangs his moral-high-ground hat on his support for the freedom of speech of his opponents.

Asiaphiles like John Jay Ray (and mainstream media) promote “The New White Flight” as Euromen withdrawing their children from the academic competition with superior Asian immigrants in public schools.  An alternate explanation is that as public school districts are populated by Asians, the public schools become academically toxic for Euro children due to the new ecology created.  How might we decide between these alternate views?  One way might be to look at the winners of the National Geographic Bee since H-1b expansion occurred in 1998 (over the objection of 80% of the US voting population).  The National Geographic Bee tends to test broader knowledge than spelling bees, including conceptual knowledge, and elimination takes more than merely getting an answer wrong—it requires a lower score on a series of questions.

The results are striking:  Of the 5 Euro children who won since 1998, 80% were home schooled.  Of the 4 Asian (or hybrid) children who won since 1998, 75% were public schooled.

Prior to 1999 there were no home schooled winners of the National Geographic Bee.

Read on for the racial data and visual phenotypes you won’t find in the Wikipedia article on the National Geographic Bee.

READ MORE...

Click on this link to for a stock and flow diagram model of ethnosexual dynamics.  (My apologies for providing a PDF rather than placing an image.)

At this time, it is just the diagram of the influences within the model, without actual arithmetic content, and highly schematic at that, but it should stimulate some discussion.  I fully expect to revise this and may update this post from time to time to reflect those changes.  When it is updated, I will edit this summary accordingly.

Briefly, the model attempts to predict the degree to which Eurofemales value Euromales as sires for children given various influences such as:

• Gender ratio
• Activation of European adaptations
• Activation of atavistic African adaptations
• Managerial class usurpation of Euromale roles
• Immigration
• Prevalence of violence
• Mother’s age at first live birth

and feeds back to the mother’s age at first live birth.

A couple of things to take note of:  Artificial insemination produces nearly 50% more females than males.  Also, European adaptations revolve around the requirement for males during rearing, for both provisioning and authority, due to harsh environmental conditions requiring cultural adaptations more than instinct.
PS: Blue arrows are influences and pipes are flows (here of populations).

Evan M. O’Dorney, an oppressive white male home schooled kid

had the audacity to win Scripps Spelling Bee and then say:

Spelling is just a bunch of memorization.

Which, of course, is true.  But, come now!  When was the last time a winner of an international intellectual competition from India said anything like that?  Is he trying to make them feel bad about themselves or something?

It should then come as no surprise that by winning this competition, which he himself denigrates, the New York Times reports that he leveraged his white male privilege against an unfortunate family from India seeking a better life in the US:

“The words that shaped Kunal Sah’s path to the Scripps National Spelling Bee — “determination,” “hope,” “anguish” — were not enough to spell victory.”

“Kunal, a 13-year-old boy from Utah who was profiled last month in an article in The New York Times, dreamed that a triumph in the bee, which began in Washington on Wednesday, would cast a spotlight on the plight of his parents. They were sent back to India last year after years of immigration processing and appeals and a rejection of their application for political asylum.”

“But Kunal was eliminated along with 178 other teenage spellers in the second round of the competition.”

I hope that home-schooled white kid who won the spelling bee feels guilty about all the trouble he’s caused.

Maybe the public school authorities need to force him to go to public schools where minority boys who have more testosterone earlier in life can beat the living hell out of him to protect themselves from his wimpy and oppressive white male privilege.

PS: To add insult to injury, we find in the initially-linked article, that this kid actively promotes the consumption of that diet of oppressors: fish!

“Fish is good for the brain,” he said. He had to skip his fish protein meal to attend a luncheon in honor of the spelling bee competitors.

There is a moment, difficult to spot to be sure, when imperilment slips by some tenth or hundredth of a degree into something else ... something darker and doom-laden ... something from which escape is no longer possible.  The elite effort if not to murder the children of Europe directly, then certainly to void the ties upon which their survival depends, has not yet reached that pivotal moment.  Not in my opinion anyway.  If it had, our little community would likely not be labouring over the creation of this rallying point.  We would, I hope, have found other ways to fight, ways more fitting to the hour.

With this in mind - this consciousness of the special meaning of time - it is appropriate to remember that the fight has been fought at every stage.  Liberalism, decadence, democracy, equality, capitalism, internationalism, Jewish self-advocacy in all its manifold guises ... these things have been critiqued by intellectuals throughout the 20th Century, and protested by activists since the flood began with the Windrush in June 1948.

Those who have fought before us were as strong in their persuasion as any Linderite, and no less pleased to shock.  But such are the antecedents of our protest.  There’s no point denying it.

Many of those brave, difficult people have paid a high price.  Some have lost life itself, some their liberty, many their livelihoods.  Some have lost their way or became disillusioned by the company they kept.  Some have fought on faithfully, for, in truth, they can make no other accomodation with the world.

Today, on a thread at Laban’s ostensibly devoted to the trial of the man accused of the murder of Charlene Downes, one of these honourable men provided a potted history of his activism.  I thought it was interesting and educational, so I am reproducing it here.

His thread-name is Veritas.

READ MORE...